| Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site | |
|
+2Cracked Atlas 1337ness_of_teh_n00b 6 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:42 pm | |
| I do actually have a more strict definition of "significant" in mind, but typing on an iPhone.. | |
|
| |
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:01 pm | |
| Right, so... 'significant.'
My first idea is any contribution that causes a rewrite of the original proposal to have 50% or more words. But I'm not completely happy with that. So, ideas? | |
|
| |
Navarre
Number of posts : 272 Localisation : Ivalice Registration date : 2012-01-15
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:55 pm | |
| how about 2 or more changes to the proposed rule that the others agree on? basically you change it once, others agree. you find flaw, point it out and change it again? | |
|
| |
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:57 pm | |
| I'unno. That would put someone who made two small changes above someone who made one massive change. | |
|
| |
Navarre
Number of posts : 272 Localisation : Ivalice Registration date : 2012-01-15
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:00 pm | |
| yeah well can you define massive change and small change? it all depends on the rule really | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:18 pm | |
| The pedant I am, I actually think you've got something going with the 'fifty percent' thing.
When comparing two proposals, there should be two ways to determine differences -- one, each word in the same numerical position as each other that are different from each other count as one word different; two, each word not in the original proposal that is in the updated proposal in between consecutive words that were in the original count as one word different. The method which yields the lowest difference should be used, and the percentage should be measured by the original proposal.
Examples time, cos that's a lot of words.
Original proposal: "flowers are somewhat yellow in spring" Updated proposal: "flowers are sometimes somewhat yellow in spring"
Method one flowers are somewhat yellow in spring flowers are sometimes somewhat yellow in spring 5/7 = 71%
Method two flowers are somewhat yellow in spring flowers are sometimes somewhat yellow in spring 1/7 = 14%
Method two came out with the lowest percentage difference, so therefore the difference is deemed to be 14% | |
|
| |
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:12 pm | |
| I repropose 305: "If a player makes a significant contribution to a proposed rule, and the amended rule is then adopted, then the player who suggested the amendment receives points equal to 50% of the points received by the player who proposed the rule. If a player males a significant contribution to a proposed rule, and the rule is rejected they lose 50% of the points lost by the player who proposed the rule. A reworded preposal is considered to have a significant contribution when the reworded proposal has 50% more, or greater, words than the original proposal.
When comparing two proposals to determine if the change counts as 'significant', there are two ways to determine differences -- one, each word in the same numerical position as each other that are different from each other count as one word different; two, each word not in the original proposal that is in the updated proposal in between consecutive words that were in the original count as one word different. The method which yields the lowest difference should be used, and the percentage should be measured by the original proposal." | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:36 pm | |
| Uh, I EBWOP my previous post, the numbers should've been '5/6' and '1/6' respectively, and the percentages should change accordingly. | |
|
| |
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:41 pm | |
| I don't know what 'EBWOP' means... | |
|
| |
Navarre
Number of posts : 272 Localisation : Ivalice Registration date : 2012-01-15
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:32 am | |
| Loving the copy paste cracked. I accept | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:50 pm | |
| - Quote :
- I don't know what 'EBWOP' means...
'Edit by way of post' I accept. | |
|
| |
Orandulum Spurt Reynolds
Number of posts : 282 Localisation : Behind you Registration date : 2012-01-16
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:50 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:58 pm | |
| Because rainbows, that's why.
But this is cool too, more points for me I guess. 1337ness! Post a score... count... thingy. | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:39 pm | |
| Why is it myyyyy job to do score counts?
(4/4)*15 = 15
Me: 11 Cracked: 27 Navarre: --7 Orandulum: --2 | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:43 pm | |
| Heh, I screwed up way earlier, I was proposal 305, and Atlas was proposal 306. Funnily enough, I got the scores right because I was simply adding one to the upper limit each time. | |
|
| |
Navarre
Number of posts : 272 Localisation : Ivalice Registration date : 2012-01-15
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:06 pm | |
| I propose rule 306: No player is allowed to propose a rule that affects the real world. Eg. you cannot propose a rule stating that you must eat a capsicum before you propose a rule. | |
|
| |
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:34 pm | |
| I reject on the grounds that forced capsicum eating is hilarious. Also, there are other amusing and useful possibilities to consider. | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:29 pm | |
| Navarre, I assume you didn't read my last post.
Also, given the presence of rule 113, I find this rule... questionable. | |
|
| |
Navarre
Number of posts : 272 Localisation : Ivalice Registration date : 2012-01-15
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:22 am | |
| EBWOP
I propose rule 307: No player is allowed to propose a rule that affects the real world. Eg. you cannot propose a rule stating that you must eat a capsicum before you propose a rule. | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:12 pm | |
| I'm waiting for Orandulum to come back to life.
In the mean time, I guess I'll reject. | |
|
| |
Orandulum Spurt Reynolds
Number of posts : 282 Localisation : Behind you Registration date : 2012-01-16
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:27 pm | |
| I'm rejecting for the same reason as Atlas, cause there is some hilarious shit we can make happen. | |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:31 pm | |
| (1/4)*15 -- 10 = --6
Me: 11 Cracked: 27 Navarre: --15 Orandulum: --2
inb4 Orandulum forgets it's his turn.
| |
|
| |
1337ness_of_teh_n00b Admin
Number of posts : 1337 Age : 113 Registration date : 2007-05-17
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:31 pm | |
| EBWOP: (1/4)*16 -- 10 = --6 | |
|
| |
Orandulum Spurt Reynolds
Number of posts : 282 Localisation : Behind you Registration date : 2012-01-16
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:48 pm | |
| I propose Rule 308: If a Participant does not acknowledge his/hers turn before 24 hours have passed since the end of the last persons turn, without previous warning of absence, then that person shall have their turn skipped and given straight to the next person in line. | |
|
| |
Cracked Atlas His Sexcellency
Number of posts : 1174 Age : 29 Registration date : 2007-07-26
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:02 pm | |
| While some time limit is a good idea, I think 24 hours is too short. Plus, it's a lot nicer to prod someone as opposed to just skipping their turn without notice. Also, when does a person's turn finish? Is it when everyone has voted, or is it when 1337ness posts a score count?
I'd suggest "If a player does not post to acknowledge his/her turn within 48 hours of the previous player's turn ending, and they have not given any notification of their absence, then they will be prodded. If the player still does not post within another 24 hours, their turn will be skipped.
The previous player's turn is officially over, in the context of this rule, when every player has voted on that player's proposal, the proposal has been officially adopted/rejected, and a score count has been posted that reflects this." | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site | |
| |
|
| |
| Vanilla Four Player; First Nomic On Site | |
|